“Sinful man is to blame for the entry of sin and death into the world .”
https://answersingenesis.org/mammals/bats-equipped-for-the-hunt/
Man is not sinful - Originally.
If one reads The Book of Genesis carefully, Eve was deceived, tricked, and taken advantage of (Eve was seeking wisdom and knowledge).
https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Genesis-Chapter-1/
https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Genesis-Chapter-3/
http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0839/__P5.HTM
We are all born of “Original Sin” - in which Jesus revoked. And of course, his blood -somewhere in Heaven - is waiting to wash us clean before entering Heaven where Jesus is our King and we become citizens of his Heavenly Nation -
Jesus only asks (actually commands!) us to stop sinning, acknowledge past sins, follow the 10 Commandments, and believe in him - “Follow Me”. Once we do this, we are no longer “Sinners”.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ten_Commandments
I am confident I am no longer a sinful person. I am now waiting to be raised on my last day,
“Everything that the Father gives me will come to me, and I will not reject anyone who comes to me, because I came down from heaven not to do my own will but the will of the one who sent me. And this is the will of the one who sent me, that I should not lose anything of what he gave me, but that I should raise it (on) the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him may have eternal life, and I shall raise him (on) the last day.” - Jesus Christ.
http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0839/__PXE.HTM
“Original Sin” is a “Negative” and only enforces weakness in anyone who accepts it as a fundamental reality of the Person. It sets up a mental theme and attitude - that is not true in Truth of a past event.
“Original Sin” - poor choice of words of a past event - a “Fall” but not “Sin”. A “Doctrine” that was “created” and a “Interpretation“ - a “Paradigm“ created by a few people several hundred years ago,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Original_sin
The concept of “Original Sin” - a “Rebuttal”. A good one and I have accepted this Truth,
“Into this raceless stew which was now Rome came Christianity. Its success is largely to be explained by its concept of a sinful world and redemption through grace, which was its natural compliment.
The doctrine of original sin would have been incomprehensible to a people whose racial identity was unadulterated.
In such a people there dwells a secure confidence in itself and in its will, which it regards as Destiny.
The concept of sin was as alien to the heroes of Homeros as it was to the ancient Indians, the Germans of Tacitus, or the epics and sagas of Dietrich von Bern.
An oppressive sense of sin is a sure symptom of racial bastardy.
Race pollution shows itself in a number of stigmata; in an absence of clear direction in thought and action; an inner self doubt; the feeling that existence is simply the wages of sin and not the necessary and mysterious imperative of self development. The sense of personal depravity leads to a yearning for grace, and this is the only hope for the products of miscegenation.” - Alfred Rosenberg, "Myth of the 20th Century".
Dietrich von Bern.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legends_about_Theoderic_the_Great
mis·ceg·e·na·tion [mìssijə náysh'n]
n (offensive when used disapprovingly, as often formerly)
1. sexual relations between races: sexual relations between people of different races, especially of different skin colors, leading to the birth of children.
2. intermarriage between races: marriage or cohabitation between people of different races.
Encarta ® World English Dictionary © & (P) 1998-2005 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
No comments:
Post a Comment